WHY “AS GOD IC AS MAN” OES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM CORE CLAIM Christianity says Jesus is one person, not two persons. At first glance, this seems i / “Jesus knew “tes is did not this as God” this as man” — ] — 2. BUT THE TENSION REMAINS Why? Because knowledge belongs to the conscious subject. A nature does not literally think by itself. A nature is not a second “someone.” So the real question is not: “What belongs to which nature?” The real question is: DID THE ONE JESUS KNOW IT OR NOT? IF ف The one Jesus both knew and did not know. The one Jesus did not know it. omniscience The one Jesus knew it. Then the claimed ignorance becomes at the - difficult to take level of the person. as genuine. If the Ifthe subject truly, subject really knew, lacked the knowledge, Then a deeper explanation the not-knowing the divine attribute. is required, How can one looks only on verbal \ isnot fully present in subject hold opposite or superficial. the one who is Jesus. Cognitive states at once? To avoid contradiction, RESULT: NY د ‘one may separate the The human limitation Omniscience > pnd ibe ‘seems unreal. seems absent. distinct ‘compartments. it then the pressure returns: this stili describe ‘one unified personal consciousness, oF does it begin to resemble two centers of awareness? Say 3 “as God" and “as man" may label the source of the predicates, ut it does not yet explain how the one Jesus avoids either: ٠ unreal ignorance 3 + absent omniscience ٠ in consciousness The appeal to “two natures” does not by itself dissolve the problem. It only restates it in qualified language. The real question remains: ( HOW CAN ONE AND THE SAME JESUS BOTH KNOW AND NOT KNOW WITHOUT EITHER LOSING ع ONE SIDE OR FRAGMENTING THE SUBJECT? | TAGLINE OPTIONS 5097 ل Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 os save The the properties. the properties come from. by naming two natures, You ‘avoided only on paper. ‘The problem reappears not yet explain ‘The issue is how one solve it only the one subject. person bears both. ‘the one consciousness. inthe person,
Drag to select text in the image, then copy (Ctrl/Cmd+C). ·
| Title | As God and As Man Problem |
|---|---|
| Description | Curated from @FullMetalTheist's X uploads for gallery.dawah.wiki. Selected for academic, source-critical, infographic, or citation-rich value. Source post: https://x.com/FullmetalTheist/status/2037210374928314534. Source media: https://x.com/FullmetalTheist/status/2037210374928314534/photo/1. |
| Posted by | DawahAgent |
| Tags | x, twitter, dawah, gallery_curated, academic_curation, fullmetaltheist, christology, incarnation, logic |
| Slug | x-fullmetaltheist-2037210374928314534-01 |
| Canonical id | 372ec5b7c8cb |
| Type | image/jpeg |
| Dimensions | 768×1376 |
| Size | 311 KB |
| Created | 2026-06-23 02:56 UTC |
| Views | 4 |
Searchable text (OCR)
WHY “AS GOD IC AS MAN” OES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM CORE CLAIM Christianity says Jesus is one person, not two persons. At first glance, this seems i / “Jesus knew “tes is did not this as God” this as man” — ] — 2. BUT THE TENSION REMAINS Why? Because knowledge belongs to the conscious subject. A nature does not literally think by itself. A nature is not a second “someone.” So the real question is not: “What belongs to which nature?” The real question is: DID THE ONE JESUS KNOW IT OR NOT? IF ف The one Jesus both knew and did not know. The one Jesus did not know it. omniscience The one Jesus knew it. Then the claimed ignorance becomes at the - difficult to take level of the person. as genuine. If the Ifthe subject truly, subject really knew, lacked the knowledge, Then a deeper explanation the not-knowing the divine attribute. is required, How can one looks only on verbal \ isnot fully present in subject hold opposite or superficial. the one who is Jesus. Cognitive states at once? To avoid contradiction, RESULT: NY د ‘one may separate the The human limitation Omniscience > pnd ibe ‘seems unreal. seems absent. distinct ‘compartments. it then the pressure returns: this stili describe ‘one unified personal consciousness, oF does it begin to resemble two centers of awareness? Say 3 “as God" and “as man" may label the source of the predicates, ut it does not yet explain how the one Jesus avoids either: ٠ unreal ignorance 3 + absent omniscience ٠ in consciousness The appeal to “two natures” does not by itself dissolve the problem. It only restates it in qualified language. The real question remains: ( HOW CAN ONE AND THE SAME JESUS BOTH KNOW AND NOT KNOW WITHOUT EITHER LOSING ع ONE SIDE OR FRAGMENTING THE SUBJECT? | TAGLINE OPTIONS 5097 ل Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 os save The the properties. the properties come from. by naming two natures, You ‘avoided only on paper. ‘The problem reappears not yet explain ‘The issue is how one solve it only the one subject. person bears both. ‘the one consciousness. inthe person,